Friday 21 November 2008

exciting happenings in the wild

lately, what has got me hooked is the state of wildlife. tigers, particularly. wild ones. and i fear, that our future generations may never know what a wild tiger is. in fact, they may never know what
wild really means. especially not, when tour packages such as these advertise wildlife reserves this way.

exciting happenings:
accidents, maulings, deaths.

what's not exciting is, 96% of India is covered by people. 4% by animals, wild animals.
when Project Tiger started in 1973, there were 1,800+ tigers. In 2007, there were 1,411.
and of course, the in-famous Sariska. where two tigers were recently translocated from Ranthambore. sadly, the forest officials couldn't translocate the third tigress, as she couldn't be found. [or did she know something about sariska we didn't--the easiest way to kill a tiger, is to shoot it inside a national park. it's like killing a man in his home. only difference is, there are too many of us.]

then i read about China. about South-Chinese Tigers being one of the most endangered animals in the world. about how it could have survived the wanton development that China undertakes. and about how IUCN believes it to be extinct in the wild.
but, a chinese official believes otherwise.
in fact, China believes tigers do exist in the wild. Proof:









unfortunately, there is a slight problem with this supposedly wild tiger's proof of existence.
apparently, the farmer who had clicked it, and the forest officials who proudly announced that the pride of their land did exist in the jungles, did not know that "A Netizen Panzhihua discovered that the tiger poster on the wall of his home shared the same features as the tiger in Zhou's photos. Even the stripes were the same. The only difference was the ears."

and slowly, the truth came out.
From a Chinese blog cum news site : Zhou Zhenglong , 53, a hunter in mountainous Zhenping county who produced photos purporting to show a South China tiger alive in the wild and who repeatedly insisted they were genuine, has been arrested on fraud charges.Seven officials were sacked, including Shaanxi forestry department's deputy director Zhu Julong - who pledged to resign should the photos prove to be fake - and six others were subject to disciplinary action.
if you are a chinese, this goes for you. did you know, that scientific evidence shows tiger bones, which are supposed to cure everything from rheumatism to blue balls, does not have any medicinal properties. that a mole rat's balls will give you the same aphrodisiacal feeling that a tiger's testicles will. or in plain simple language, your balls won't work if your balls are lousy, even if you had that tiger bone soup in the evening, no matter how hard you try to get it on with that hot woman.

in Vietnam, they advertise tiger balls saying, "eat once, make love six times a night and that will bring you four sons."

please. i am not a seafood person. but oyster sounds much more potent than a pair of balls.

the chinese incident is, however, too similar to the indian forest officials' version to go unnoticed. back in 2005, when Indian Express broke the story of the Sariska tigers, every forest official denied it. some, in fact, even said that the tigers were in hiding. Hiding-yes sir!
what the incident shows, is the great bureaucrat's propensity to show results. to show that he cannot be blamed, and that all reports of local extinction are overrated.
what the Chinese officials did not count on, was that one could trace and test digital photographs.

what is this enigma called the tiger?
Corbett wrote, "when I think of a tiger, I see a young boy about eight or nine, walking in the bush without a care in the world. And he comes face-to-face with a tiger, who looks at him, gives him a scowl as if to say 'what the hell are you doing here boy?', and walks off into the bush." [I am sorry I don't have the book to repeat the exact quotation, but in case you are interested, it's from Man Eaters of Kumaon.]
Geoffrey Ward talks of four different individuals in India, who found their calling in this striped king, and writes of each of their trials and tribulations against the 'mighty' Indian bureaucracy. Billy Arjan Singh, for example-who was single handedly responsible for setting up the Dudhwa National Park, and the bureaucrats forbid him to enter the park because he was accused of stealing firewood from the jungle. [Tigerwallahs: Saving the greatest of the great cats]
Ruth Padell writes of Ullas Karanth, who kept screaming at how tiger pugmarks were a highly unreliable way to count tigers, and quotes an interesting anecdote: Two tigers were kept in a cage, and after a couple of hours, several 'scientists' were brought in to guess how many there were inside. The lowest figure was EIGHT. the highest-17.

it is difficult to imagine how, in a country with a population that grows at nearly 2.5% a year and has the highest number of malnutritioned children in the world, can someone find it possible to even think of saving tigers. especially since a tiger pelt can get a villager more than what he can earn the entire year through his farm. but, as India's tigerwallahs have always argued, to save the tiger, you have to involve the local community.

Understand this: The world's highest demand of tiger parts come from China, a country where the tiger is supposed to have evolved first, and now has died out in the wild. The demand for tiger parts is ever-increasing, and now, China is "farming" them, like horses or cows.
And here we are, in the countries where the Tiger still roams free, atleast in a few parts.
If you are an animal-lover, hunting a cuddly-looking tiger cub will definitely not appeal to you.
If you are a nature-lover, imagining a jungle without its residents should not appeal to you.
If you are one with a conscience, driving a species extinct for its pelt and bones cannot appeal to you.
And finally, if you are a patriot [anything, any idea to poke at your conscience just to save the tiger], imagine this: your country's tigers are being killed, to sustain that old fart's sexual appetite, or that executive's exquisite lunch laced with tiger wine, must not appeal to you.

if you remember your enviromental studies 101, you must remember: kill the apex of the food chain, and the order of nature goes awry.

if you can, please pass it on, especially to any Chinese friends you might have.
as i said before, anything is plausible if it works to save the tiger.

Saturday 1 November 2008

we are liberal, but hey, don't disgust, disturb, disappoint us!

this week's tehelka has one of the most interesting letters to the editor i have in recent times. it gives an interesting insight into the characteristics of the english magazine-reading mind. sadly, it is not something to cheer about.
i quote:
"disturbed.disgusted.disappointed. This is how I would describe my and my friends' feelings after reading your cover story on homosexuality in India.
Disgusting it is, for using the word 'love' for the carnal, unnatural and debased sexual infatuation that the deviant group is afflicted with.
Disturbing for an attempt to impose respectability and acceptance to acts, that till now, were limited to closets of those suffering from the malady.
And disappointing it is, as valuable space in your esteemed journal has been wasted on the fantasy of a miniscule deviant group, which feels compelled to ape the West in all they do.
Without being distracted, I hope you continue your crusade against the rampant corruption, communalism, criminalisation of politics, partisan attitude of our police and the travesty of truth and justice that we see amidst us every day."
The letter was from a MA Jaleel.
i have a few problems.
firstly, the usage of the word disgusting for substituting carnal, unnatural and debased desires into love! i am sure the person concerned might surely be an expert on love to understand its nuances and therefore, comment on homosexual love as just a sexual fantasy, but as a die-hard upholder of the liberal indian dream and as a crusader of justice, he does not remember what a bench of the Delhi High Court had said a few weeks back :"These are not scientific reports. These are articles quoting Bible, which is propaganda. Your arguments should be based on scientific reports. Show us scientific reports which justify criminalisation of such acts (gay sex)"
secondly, the reader calls it disturbing that the article was an attempt to gain respectability to an act indulged in by a 'deviant' group. the article in question is not an attempt to gain any respect; rather, it is an insight into what it is like to be homosexual in a country like India, and does not in anyway, become self-apologetic or empathy-arousing. and well, the reader, like many other 'illiterates' who only read hindi magazines, does not know what a malady is. english lesson for him:
malady:
1.any disorder or disease of the body, esp. one that is chronic or deepseated.

a malady is a disease. how can a sexual behaviour be termed as one? is homosexuality chronic? is it contagious? did all the readers of tehelka change their sexual behaviour after reading the article?
Mr. Jaleel, however, thinks otherwise. maybe he has turned gay as well, after reading the article, and wrote the letter in a moment of frustration?

i don't claim to be a scholar on homosexual issues, nor can i completely understand the stigma that gay people have to face in this society, but even for a straight guy it's easy to understand, once you read the story in question, that no author is asking you to prerogate their position. noone is asking you to support their fight against an illogical act, which deems a blowjob illegal. the magazine does however, tell you about the matunga racket, and how the mumbai police sodomise gay men on threats of charging them under the very same act.
how is that disgusting?disappointing?disturbing?
yes it is disgusting. disgusting that despite a history of 4,500 years of civilisation where same-sex love was not frowned upon (don't believe me, it's everywhere: krishna and arjun's relationship; arjun's year-in-exile as a cross-dressing, weapon-wielding transvestite; bhishma's understanding that shikhandi was the woman he had spurned in a man's body; khajuraho, kamasutra, so on and so forth), this shining nation frowns on the very idea of sex. where women are thought to be purely for quenching desires and the medium of marriage is the best excuse for people to have sex whenever they want and not pay for it. where a girl cannot sit in a bus after 9 anywhere in this great nation, except a tiny section in the north-east--another bit of land our english speaking readers don't bother to know about, and hence, cannot be inspired from.
disappointing, for it was a rare breed of article that needed to be encouraged more. sadly, receiving letters like these will make the author think twice, or any one else attempting to write something similar. disappointing, that whoever thought english education would be the best way to inculcate a liberal mind, a mind that does not gravitate towards any prejudices.
and lastly, disturbing, because this letter reflects not the single reader himself; it is a microcosm of the bigger picture, a reader who knows corruption and communalism are detrimental to human society, that travesty of justice occurs every day, that our police is not ours to behold, that our politics can never be clean. unfortunately, for the same reader, deviant minds like the one who wrote the article must not be allowed to spread their malady, or else, this great cradle of human civilisation will be infected.